We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2019-06-23T09:40:00Z

What needs improvement with Cisco IOS Security?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Cisco IOS Security.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
1717 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

It's a good device yet it's not a market leader. There are better options for customers to choose from. There could be a bit more functions on offer that could make it easier to use.

2021-08-09T15:52:54Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

I think they should bring back remote VPN for users. However, I understand the attempt is to have these functions inside the firewalls and not the routers or the IOS devices.

2021-04-01T09:54:31Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The configuration should be easier in the solution.

2021-03-19T16:20:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It would be ideal if the solution had more capacity. Right now, we are almost hitting the maximum capacity of the product. If they could provide more capacity for the same product, that would be great.

2020-12-23T10:57:32Z
author avatar
Top 10MSP

With respect to user-friendliness, it is a command-line interface and those with such experience will get along just fine, whereas others may struggle. My expectation is that it will remain a primarily command-line-based technology. The biggest annoyance is probably the quality control of the code. They have to make sure that they are better at vetting bugs and software issues before they release code to the general public.

2020-09-29T05:58:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I think the user interface for IOS Security needs to be improved. I think the signature updates and all the other critical definitions need to be updated more frequently.

2020-09-27T04:10:08Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

A few things have room for improvement in your opinion. That would start with cost. Cisco products are more expensive than the competition, but the additional cost usually gets absorbed by the name recognition. Most people have Cisco or have familiarity with it, so they go with it. If they want the top quality product, they immediately feel comfortable with the Cisco name brand. That is where we come in as consultants. We bend over backward to make product comparisons and framing for solving the needs posed by an organization. I see something is a better fit for them that they could use. It would reduce their CapEx, their expenses, and it would fit them better all at the same time. The client may still want Cisco despite the recommendation that we make. But usually, that is what it is. Cisco fits, and if they want to spend the money, we make sure that it is within their budget. They feel more comfortable with Cisco, and they have had Cisco in the past, so we go with Cisco then. Cisco is great. A lot of the tech companies are doing really well. But Cisco is still in the forefront. They are on top of this category of products. I can not think of anything else they could do because they cover pretty much everything that you would need a firewall for. Then you get Cisco's support behind the products. I would think it would be a lot better for us and we could make more money if we try to recommend that clients put drop-in boxes at every location. But we do not choose to do that unless there is a purpose for it. In most cases, we would prefer clients to go the OpEx route. It takes a lot to offset the cost of Cisco so if they are going to do a cloud solution, their costs are metered per month by whatever solution they have. That is a lot better for projecting costs, and then there is the benefit of everything being upgraded in the cloud for them. They do not have to worry about anything. It just works.

2020-09-21T06:33:12Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The pricing of the solution can be improved. It's not cheap. It's quite expensive. The company needs to make its solution more affordable to make it more accessible to larger markets. Otherwise, it's seen as an enterprise-level solution that small or medium-sized organizations can't afford and therefore they won't even look at it.

2020-09-21T06:33:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

I would love it if it has a link-by-link feature, integration with Unified Threat Management (UTM), and load balancers. They haven't got any link-by-link feature right now, which can be a very attractive option. This link-by-link feature can also be made available for Cisco's UTM firewalls. The link-by-link feature is available in some of the other firewalls. Currently, integration with UTM is missing. Cisco IOS Security also doesn't have the load balancers and a few things that need to be done to get a good UTM firewall. Normally, other firewalls have UTM. As a next-generation firewall, it's good, but as a UTM, it has to do some work.

2020-08-11T06:17:00Z
author avatar
Real User

External threats are changing every day, so there are new features coming in. We're more into the command line interface rather.

2019-07-02T06:57:00Z
author avatar
Real User

In the next release of this solution, we would like to see support for the 100BT and 7000 models. We have experienced bugs in the solution.

2019-07-02T06:57:00Z
author avatar
MSP

I think setup could be one area for improvement. I would also like to see them add integration with cloud solutions like Umbrella, as well as some monitoring improvements. This would let us connect a new platform and cloud solution for a site.

2019-07-02T06:57:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I wish it would be more like the next generation firewall technology. There should be more selection between the application and filtering. I would appreciate updates to reporting, in terms of data entry.

2019-07-02T06:57:00Z
author avatar
Real User

If they could increase the performance a little better because the device sometimes gets slow. If they could increase the performance it would be great.

2019-06-30T10:29:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

With Cisco IOS, especially the routers, don't have like long-term tendency features, or high availability features available for the IOS. Also, it could use a better user interface.

2019-06-26T05:26:00Z
author avatar
Real User

We don't love everything about the product. For now, it's what we're using. It's okay. It is difficult to set up. The training is okay. The pricing is standard. It will be great if they can make it more easy to use the features. The interface is not user-friendly, but a normal IT technician can handle it. Most of the features only work with Cisco equipment. It's about connectivity. Most of their features are meant for Cisco. You cannot integrate them with any other vendor. Cisco needs to be more flexible with the integration of other solutions.

2019-06-26T05:25:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I think it's a complicated product. It is very complicated, especially in the design. If in some way you mess up the logic and design, you can really mess up and you will hate your life. The dashboard is actually very complicated. There's a lot of options. They don't need to do this. They need to make it more simple. Going to the direct point, showing what to do, where to configure, how to make the policy. They need to simplify the dashboard management more. Also, they need to improve the dashboard statistics. We need to see the statistics in a more organized way and clear. Reporting features, I think are also missing. It should be there. Maybe they need to add in posturing. Cisco is able to check if a device is updated or not. Taking action to isolate it outside the network, and then requesting automatically for the updates to that system would be helpful. It's something in automation they can improve.

2019-06-23T09:40:00Z
Learn what your peers think about Cisco IOS Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2021.
554,586 professionals have used our research since 2012.