We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Tenable SC OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Tenable SC is #5 ranked solution in top Vulnerability Management tools. IT Central Station users give Tenable SC an average rating of 8 out of 10. Tenable SC is most commonly compared to Tenable.io Vulnerability Management:Tenable SC vs Tenable.io Vulnerability Management. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 25% of all views.
What is Tenable SC?

Tenable SC consolidates and evaluates vulnerability data across the enterprise, prioritizing security risks and providing a clear view of your security posture. With SecurityCenter, get the visibility and context you need to effectively prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities, ensure compliance with IT security frameworks, standards and regulations, and take decisive action to ensure the effectiveness of your IT security program and reduce business risk.

Tenable SC is also known as Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter.

Tenable SC Buyer's Guide

Download the Tenable SC Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2021

Tenable SC Customers

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Tenable SC Video

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Tenable SC pricing:
  • "The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."
  • "I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."
  • "Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."
  • "We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."

Tenable SC Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
JM
CIO / IT Consultant at RedShift
Reseller
Top 20
Good dashboards, reporting, and technical support, with a low rate of errors

Pros and Cons

  • "This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."
  • "The integration is very good, although it still needs to improve."

What is our primary use case?

We are a reseller and Tenable SC is one of the products that we implement for our clients.

The primary use case is to check for compliance against a specific framework, like NIST, CIS, or something similar. Tenable will check compliance on the assets against that specific framework and give that visibility to the technical staff, top management, and the risk management team. In turn, this will enable them to evaluate the risk that they are facing for non-compliance issues.

The second use case is helping the technical staff that handles updates and upgrades to the operating system. It means that they have the most urgent upgrades that they need to cover the high-risk vulnerabilities that can be found and exploited.

Beyond this, Tenable SC assists with malware detection and similar functionality.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the dashboards and reporting. They have multiple dashboards and reports for different types of details that can be used for different levels of reporting.  This means that by using a high-level report, the top rank in the company can understand what the risk is, as well as how it is violating policy. Similarly, technical people can use a more detailed report to understand what they have to cover and what the criticality of it is.

This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives.

There are multiple types of engines that cover almost any necessity that the company can have for vulnerability and compliance.

What needs improvement?

Parallel scanning would be a nice improvement because it would speed up the detection process. It is not possible to search for vulnerabilities and do compliance checking at the same time. Rather, they are done one after the other.

The integration is very good, although it still needs to improve. For example, it would be useful to have better integration with other tools in the space of identity management (IAM). As it is now, integration with new tools has to be developed specifically, so it's not easy.

We would like to see better collection capability for external data that will help to improve detection and discovery.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Tenable SC for six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In the past six years, we have had no disruption in terms of functionality. We have seen problems arise because of development and deployment strategy, but it is a very stable product. We have not had any problems with our implementations.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This platform is very scalable, both horizontally and vertically.

Our customers for Tenable SC vary in size. A smaller one might have 500 or 1,000 assets with two or three users, whereas a larger organization might have 100,000 assets with 30 users.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support from Tenable is very agile. We use them regularly when we have problems.

There are three levels of support, all of which are very adept and available. It is very easy to get in touch with support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used to work with Rapid7 Metasploit.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is always a little bit complex because most of the time, the people don't really know about their infrastructure. So, the most complex part is becoming familiar with the infrastructure and knowing what to search for. Tenable is very helpful in this regard because it has tools for discovery that help people to understand their infrastructure.

There is always a danger if the product is not well-configured but afterward, it is easy to use. When correctly implemented, this is a very effective and accurate product.

The length of time required for deployment varies based on several factors. The first is the level of integration, the second is the complexity of the assets that need to be covered, and the third is the maturity of the infrastructure. It can take weeks to deploy in an environment with a very mature infrastructure. If it is a larger organization that is graphically dispersed then it can even take months, depending on the capability of the company to cover all of the necessities for scanning.

The company has to address the necessities of the vulnerability management capabilities because it puts stress on traffic, stress on hosts, and it needs to be well-designed. Taking these precautions is necessary so that there is no damage to the infrastructure.

In the case of a smaller company, with perhaps 1,000 assets, it can take a week to install it and get everything working.

What about the implementation team?

Maintenance for Tenable is a necessity, as it is a product that grows and changes because there are new detections every day. Sometimes, a detection is verified, whereas in other cases, support is needed to perform the verification.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing fees are based on the number of assets. The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added.

There are two types of licenses available, which are the subscription, and the perpetual with maintenance. The subscription is the same price every year, with very small variations over the years. In the case of a perpetual license, there is a high initial cost compared to the subscription, but the maintenance is much lower.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have researched other products on the market and by comparison, I would rate Tenable SC a ten out of ten. It still has some features lacking, but it is better than the other solutions that are on the market.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to search for a certified partner to help with the process. It's not difficult, but it's very important to have a partner who knows the product well. The first steps in the implementation have to be the correct ones. If not, the product will not achieve the objectives that the company usually needs. It would be wrong for someone that doesn't know the product very well to begin implementing it by themselves.

This is the best product that we have found for risk management.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
TG
Program Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
Monitors our whole environment in real time and makes everything more secure

Pros and Cons

  • "The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."
  • "I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on."

What is our primary use case?

At work we use the enterprise version of Tenable, Tenable.io, and I also use Tenable.sc — which I refer to as SecurityCenter — for local scanning.

I use Tenable SecurityCenter every day to scan our entire environment for vulnerabilities. I use a local license during the discovery process for penetration testing. So I'll do an en masse scan, and then also do a scan with Tenable to scan for IPs and vulnerabilities.

User-wise, with Tenable SecurityCenter, there's different roles. We have security analysts, admin, etc. I'd say there's probably four or five different roles from people that can just go in and view. Security analysts can upload manual scans and create dashboards and download reports. Then administrators can create accounts, assign roles and responsibilities, and things like that.

How has it helped my organization?

Tenable SecurityCenter has absolutely improved our organization, by making everything more secure and helping ensure solid vulnerability management.

What is most valuable?

The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful.

What needs improvement?

I'm pretty happy with it, but I do see a lot of stuff coming out about risk-based vulnerability management. And so I've been looking at that. I don't think we're using that as of yet and it seems like a newer feature they're talking about a lot that I'm interested in.

I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on.

There was also an issue with SecurityCenter once where we had agents deployed on each device, and while it was scanning we were collecting the data real time. During this process, we had an enclave that was not submitting. It didn't have the agent installed because it wasn't connected to the enterprise network.

They were scanning locally and submitting the scans and we would then upload them into SecurityCenter manually. Each time that there were any duplicates with host names or IPs, or that there were issues with the scanner device with authentication, it failed. But then you scanned it again and it was successful.

When you uploaded that, SecurityCenter was counting it as two devices. And when you ran your report for unauthorized devices, even though it was scanned a second time successfully, the first time would show as a failure. So it was throwing off reporting.

So we would run a report and say, "Okay, which device has failed scanning with authentication?" And it would give a device and we'd be like, "Well, here's the secondary scan showing that it was successful." And so we were having to manually go in there and delete the failed ones.

And that was a pain in the butt. We eventually got that enclave online so we fixed the problem, but I felt that was a limitation of Tenable SecurityCenter that it couldn't see that.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Tenable SecurityCenter for the past few years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have only run into one troublesome issue that I can remember. It had to do with the way SecurityCenter inaccurately reported real-time scan results whenever there was a transient problem such as with a duplicate host name or IP, or with authentication.

It was a pain to deal with, because we kept having to go in and manually delete all the failed (but actually successful) scan results.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

When it comes to scalability, so far so good, and no issues. We've got the whole environment monitored right now and I don't see any significant increases in use anytime soon.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is good. Because I don't give out tens much for anything, I would say in the eight to nine range, out of ten.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

For vulnerability management, Tenable SecurityCenter is the only one I've used in the past six years. Though we do use other tools in conjunction with it.

We've pretty much used Nessus for scanning, vulnerability management, and reporting, and that's it. And it does it very well. And then I use different tools for other things. I'm sure Tenable had that on the plugins for other things, but we don't use those.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

I personally implement SecurityCenter with a local license. And then we also have different roles like security analysts and administrators who can just go in and perform various functions such as uploading manual scans, creating dashboards, downloading reports, assigning accounts, and so on.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing. 

What other advice do I have?

I can easily recommend Tenable SecurityCenter, and I have nothing really bad to say about it. I think it's a great tool for what it does. I enjoy the webinars, and the people that run the company seem very engaged with what's going on when you're into current events and the overall security climate, and they're continuously looking to improve.

I can't speak to every option that they have, but I have no reservations recommending them.

I would rate Tenable SecurityCenter an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Learn what your peers think about Tenable SC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AG
Information Security Analyst at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Intuitive with excellent technical support and good stability

Pros and Cons

  • "Their overall cost of service is pretty good."
  • "The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."

What is our primary use case?

Essentially we use the solution to monitor hard devices on a network with it. That includes laptops, desktops, tablets, et cetera. I'm just using that to make sure that all of our patching is up to date.

What is most valuable?

The UI, the user interface, is really, really good. It's really simple. I started with no prior experience in vulnerability management and picked it up in less than a day, pretty quickly. It's very intuitive.

Their overall cost of service is pretty good. 

I've worked with my CS manager and with them a lot, and I'd say every case I've opened, they've reached out to me within two hours. They're pretty prompt in their responses and overall the company is really easy to get ahold of.

Scaling the solution is very easy.

The stability of the product is pretty good.

What needs improvement?

The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time. I'll be searching for a gallery or a laptop and I can't find it due to the fact that the DNS when it was scanned went in as something non-sensical, like M P X 23 Z. That's the biggest issue I have with it. it's some sort of strange glitch.

For how long have I used the solution?

While I started using the solution in January of last year, the company itself has been on the solution for about three years or so.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the solution has been quite good. I haven't experienced any real problems so far. It's been a rather smooth proess.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scaling the solution would be pretty simple. The process would require us to reach out to Tenable to get more licenses, however, that's a pretty simple process. Overall, it's pretty easy. Essentially it'd just be adding a list of all the new IPs into any asset groups that they would be involved in. I don't think it would take much longer than a week.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is excellent. They are extremely responsive and very helpful. We are quite satisfied with the level of support we've received from them.

I would give them a ten out of ten. They are very prompt and very knowledgeable. They are great at answering questions and walking you through anything step-by-step.

How was the initial setup?

When I started, the company was actually in the process of revamping the solution. 

It was a two-day process and the company walked us through the entire thing. I had a Tenable engineer on-call with me for eight hours. It was a long process, however, it was easy as they were walking me through it, step-by-step.

What about the implementation team?

When we did a recent re-vamp, Tenable was on hand to walk us through the entire process. We had a very positive experience with them.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't handle the billing and therefore don't have an exact idea of how much the solution costs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We just renewed the solution and didn't look into any other product on the market before we did.

What other advice do I have?

We are just customers and end-users of the product.

If a company does decide to implement the solution, I'd advise working with Tenable engineers during the process, and even afterward, in order to ensure everything is set up appropriately.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten We've had a largely very positive experience with the solution so far.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
MT
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Easy to install, very customizable with a lot of templates available; great technical support

Pros and Cons

  • "Very customizable with a lot of templates."
  • "Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."

What is our primary use case?

I'm a pre-sales engineer and we are resellers of Tenable.

What is most valuable?

This solution is very customizable compared to everything else I've seen on the market, so you can easily customize it to suit your needs. There are a lot of templates you can use and you can install it pretty quickly so in one hour you can have your scanner up and running.

What needs improvement?

I think the company should redo their web page because the way things are now there are a lot of things you can't do. For example, if you want to filter something on the solution and have it filter down to all of your widgets, you can't do it, you have to go from one widget to the other. It takes some time if you have a big customer dashboard that's using some data. I think that the integration with a solution like Jira could be a little bit better for when you create tickets based on your vulnerability.

I know they are working on additional features related to the integration with the patch management like Qualys has, which is really amazing. This is the future and I know they're working on it. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for the past six or seven years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Usually the solution is stable but it can be a little bit tricky which I think depends on the kind of BME and the sizing used. I'd say it was 80%, 85% stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very scalable, it's one of the most scalable solutions that I've used so far, compared to Rapid7 and Qualys, it's very scalable. You can use it pretty much with anything, even if you start with 1000 IPs and scale up from 1000 to 10,000.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is very efficient and they escalate the tickets when you have a big issue. When you open a ticket, they respond within the hour and they're pretty quick to find the issue. If you have a bigger issue, you can set up a Zoom call with them and that's very helpful. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used Rapid7 in the past and I've also used Qualys a little as well. I work with customers, so I go with whatever they want to use. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward and quick. 

What other advice do I have?

I would definitely recommend the solution but I would tell people that it requires dedicated staff. You need to have someone looking at what's going on when you scan and you need somebody to go through all the results, otherwise it just sits there.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
BT
Information Security Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Good reporting, alerting, and filtering capabilities and good integration with multiple vendors

Pros and Cons

  • "Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable. Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful."
  • "There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."

What is our primary use case?

We had a requirement to connect multiple branches into one console. We installed Nessus at multiple locations and then connected Nessus. We did the service scan and got the report on the central site with Tenable SC.

How has it helped my organization?

Previously, we were using Nessus, which required a lot of manual work in terms of reporting. We do a lot of customization, and Tenable SC has been very helpful. Reporting is just a click away in Tenable SC, whereas it used to take a long time to create a similar report and customize it in Nessus. 

What is most valuable?

Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable.

Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful.

What needs improvement?

There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Our usage is the same. Currently, no increment is required in terms of the license.

How are customer service and technical support?

They are good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used to use Rapid7, but there were too many false positives. So, we switched to Nessus, but in Nessus, we faced the challenge of reporting. Nessus required a lot of manual work in terms of reporting. Tenable SC has been quite helpful for reporting. 

How was the initial setup?

It is not straightforward. When you do integrations, it turns into a complex solution, but this complexity is required. If security is a priority, then complexity will be there for enterprise security.

It didn't take a long time. In one month, we were able to configure and run the reports. Everything was done within a month. We were in desperate need of such a solution, and this solution came. We already knew about integrations from the white papers and documents available on the Tenable website. They were very helpful. So, doing integration was not an issue. We did it without much effort. 

What about the implementation team?

I was heading this project as a project manager.

What other advice do I have?

It is a much better solution than other competitors. It provides almost everything that is required in terms of vulnerability management. If you are looking for overall enterprise security in terms of integrations and vulnerability management, you should go for Tenable SC or Tenable SCCV.

I would rate Tenable SC a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
ME
Senior Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Excellent, responsive support; it is dependable, scales well, and is simple to install

Pros and Cons

  • "It's a very useful tool."
  • "The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team."

What is our primary use case?

Tenable SC can be used in any company for vulnerability management life cycle.

What is most valuable?

It's a very useful tool.

What needs improvement?

Internal ticketing systems require improvement. 

The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Tenable SC for more than five years.                                                             

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Tenable SC is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

According to the sizing that we are dealing with in this first stage, it is very scalable.

We have not experienced any issues with the scalability of Tenable SC.

The information security team has access to the solution. The number of users varies from one environment to another. It ranges, from five users to ten users maximum.

The same number of users can easily deploy and maintain this solution, included the access manager, administrator, and anyone who can configure the policies they test.

How are customer service and support?

Tenable technical support is very good. They are very helpful, and responsive.

We had experienced some delays in two or three tickets we started, but that may have been because of the client, they were very unresponsive.

Overall, the technical support is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with Rapid 7 and Qualys.

How was the initial setup?

The installation is very straightforward. It's the easiest solution that I have ever implemented.

The installation was quick, taking no more than one or two minutes.

What about the implementation team?

I completed the installation myself. It can easily be installed by anyone.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license is perpetual and is based on the number of IP addresses you want to scan in your organization.

The support comes with a different license.

What other advice do I have?

Tenable SC is without a doubt a good choice.

I would rate Tenable SC a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Amine BEYAOUI
Senior Partner / Co-Founder at SKYTEK
Reseller
Top 20
Review about Tenable SC

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
  • "The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."

What is most valuable?

The dashboard is a valuable feature. So is the scanning, which is based on the nexus, and the scripts. The solution offers an extremely limited margin of error, of obtaining false positives within it. These are its strengths. 

What needs improvement?

Everything in life has room for improvement. While I consider the solution to perform as it should, most customers, for the wrong reasons, wish for it to have the penetration testing capabilities. This is not a problem with the product, but with the demands of the customer and I remain uncertain if I can meet these. 

The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor. 

For how long have I used the solution?

An easily installable and very scalable and stable solution which boasts great dashboard and scanning features

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. It can go up many thousands of endpoints for scanning purposes.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support does what it should. The solution is pretty straightforward and simple. As such, as with all vulnerability management solutions, it will not need much technical support and this is rarely required. I am referring to the need to address bugs. Mainly, the support will focus on the search for new features or reports. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward and very easy. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product. 

What other advice do I have?

The size of our customers run the gamut, from small medium to large, in certain cases exceeding 5,000 IPs. 

I would definitely recommend the solution. 

I rate Tenable SC as an eight-plus out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Flag as inappropriate
MS
IT Consultant - Microsoft Design and Implementation at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Top 20
Has good scans and good stability

Pros and Cons

  • "The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
  • "The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for vulnerability assessment of our internal network.

What is most valuable?

The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution. The reporting isn't so good but I use scans the most. The reporting needs a lot of work on the template. 

What needs improvement?

There should be an easier way to build your own type of reports because the data is there but it is quite painful to get what I want from it. I prefer Tenable SC to other solutions.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Tenable SC for a little more than two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability and scalability are good. The administrators use it. We have three regular users. 

How are customer service and technical support?

We have contacted their customer support and they were fine.

How was the initial setup?

We didn't have any issues with the initial setup. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis. 

What other advice do I have?

Nessus is for a single company and tenable SC is for when you've got multiple repositories. SC is the same as Nessus, except it's got central logging. It's the same thing. For large widespread companies, you use SC, if you're a small to medium-sized company, you use Nessus.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten because of the reporting. It needs improvement. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Product Categories
Vulnerability Management
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Tenable SC Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.