We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Mojo Networks OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Mojo Networks is #8 ranked solution in top Wireless LAN tools. PeerSpot users give Mojo Networks an average rating of 8 out of 10. Mojo Networks is most commonly compared to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN: Mojo Networks vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 41% of all views.
What is Mojo Networks?
Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Mojo Networks was previously known as Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: January 2022

Mojo Networks Customers
Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center
Mojo Networks Video

Mojo Networks Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Mojo Networks pricing:
  • "It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."
  • "We have a term that is renewed every three years."
  • "The cost is a one-time fee."
  • "The price of the solution is too high for our country."
  • Mojo Networks Reviews

    Filter by:
    Filter Reviews
    Industry
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Company Size
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Job Level
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Rating
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Considered
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Order by:
    Loading...
    • Date
    • Highest Rating
    • Lowest Rating
    • Review Length
    Search:
    Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
    Founder, Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Secure built-in wireless, stable, scalable, and has the best support
    Pros and Cons
    • "Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
    • "The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

    What is our primary use case?

    Arista Wifi (Mojo) is a very security-centric Wi-Fi solution that is highly scalable. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    I was an employee there, so this question doesn't apply.

    What is most valuable?

    Mojo now has been procured by Arista. Arista Wi-Fi is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless. d

    What needs improvement?

    The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive.

    Price is the only area that needs improvement.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I was in a technology commercial role. I worked in Mojo support for five years and another six years as a part of the sales team.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Mojo Networks (Arista) is a stable solution. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It's a scalable product.

    I have deployed it right from an SMB to an extra-large enterprise. The largest deployment I've seen is approximately 200,000 devices.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Technical support is one of the best that you could come across.

    There is no need for improvement with technical support.

    How was the initial setup?

    The installation is easy, it is absolutely plug-and-play.

    You don't need an expert to install it, any layman could easily do the installation.

    200,000 devices were managed by a team of eight.

    What about the implementation team?

    I implemented the solution myself as well as through partners

    What was our ROI?

    Arista Wifi (Mojo) is highly scalable with a single pane of glass for management. Troubleshooting capabilities and deep insights are praise worthy. Overall this means a reduced management efforts. This in itself helps you achieve a great ROI.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    It's a very costly solution, but someone who values security would definitely look up to Mojo Networks (Arista Wi-Fi).

    It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value. 

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    After using Mojo, I have evaluated HP Aruba. It was a really nice solution as well. They offer a lot of flexibility when it comes to deployment architecture. Depending upon the size of your network, you could choose different options. They have an instant DP, functionality or, architecture that becomes economical because it doesn't require a special controller.

    At the same time, if you are deploying a large network, they have hardware controllers as well. 

    The only flipside for them is lack of functionality in Cloud managed wifi front. What I have seen is that the cloud-based Aruba Wi-Fi is not exactly as one would expect cloud Wi-Fi to be. I have seen Mist, which is now Juniper Mist, Cisco Meraki, and Arista Mojo, and when compared to the cloud offering of these competitors, it is the clinch in armor for Aruba. 

    However, the lifetime warranty that they offer makes their devices very attractive.

    It's moderately priced, and at the same time, it offers a lifetime warranty, which makes it a preferred solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    On a technical level, I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10. But from the cost perspective, I would have to reduce the rating. 

    I would rate Mojo Networks an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    CTO at JabJabGroup
    Real User
    Top 5
    Simple to install and use, offers good visibility, and the technical support is excellent
    Pros and Cons
    • "The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
    • "The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are service providers and we implement service solutions for our clients. It's for office and workspace environments.

    What is most valuable?

    Mojo Networks offers many features. The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good.

    The navigator on the cloud interface is simple, and the installation is simple and straightforward as well.

    The most important thing for us is the visibility in our applications.

    What needs improvement?

    The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world. I would say that it is not on point.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been dealing with Mojo Networks for three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This solution is stable and we have not experienced any issues.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    The technical support is excellent.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Previously, we have used Cisco. Cisco is more expensive and with Mojo, the interface is simple. The information is quick and in terms of configuration and troubleshooting, Mojo is easier.

    I think that Mojo, Aerohive, and Extreme are the ones we primarily use.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup is simple and straightforward.

    To deploy and set up an AP takes less than five minutes, regardless of the location. It's simple on the cloud interface.

    What about the implementation team?

    Maintenance and support are things that we generally do ourselves. If it something beyond us then we have to contact the support team.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    We have a term that is renewed every three years.

    What other advice do I have?

    At certain points, there are hardware updates and they send notifications before they do the updates.

    I would recommend this solution to anyone who is interested in using it. I would suggest using Mojo before Cisco.

    They have a firewall, web content filtering, and they have the HEP services. From a technical aspect, this is a good product.

    I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    Find out what your peers are saying about Arista, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: January 2022.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Scales well and offers good security with very good stability
    Pros and Cons
    • "The solution is very stable."
    • "The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."

    What is most valuable?

    The security is the most valuable aspect of the solution.

    The solution is very stable.

    The product scales well.

    What needs improvement?

    The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex.

    Technical support could be more helpful. They are lacking a bit in that regard.

    I can't think of any specific features the solution is lacking at the moment. It's pretty well-rounded as a product.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've been using the solution for almost two and a half years at this point.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The solution is very stable. We don't face any issues with its performance. It doesn't crash. There's no freezing. I don't recall bugs or glitches. It's reliable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution scales well. If a company needs to scale the solution to suit the changing needs of their organization, they should be able to do so quite easily.

    We tend to deal with a lot of enterprise-level clients, so the solution itself gets quite large.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    While technical support is good, they could still improve upon their services.

    How was the initial setup?

    The difficulty of the initial implementation varies. For AP installations, for example, it's bulkier and more on the side of complexity. Therefore, setups aren't always the most straightforward.

    What other advice do I have?

    We are partners. We have a business relationship with the product.

    I'm more on the client-side. On a large scale, we tend to support a corporate network.

    I'd recommend the solution.

    Overall, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It does everything we need it to do, and it scales well. it's stable and offers good security. If technical support was better or if the implementation could be simplified, I'd give it full points.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
    Director of IT at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
    Real User
    Straightforward setup but lacks the ability to quickly see any issues on the network
    Pros and Cons
    • "Initial setup was straightforward."
    • "Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

    What is our primary use case?

    Our primary use case is for guests and corporate WiFi. The solution is deployed on-premise in our three offices.

    What is most valuable?

    Its value is that it provides WiFi for our guests and corporate.

    What needs improvement?

    Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that.

    An additional feature would be the ability to have better insights to see who's connected from a mobile device.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using this solution for 11 years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Stability is good. However, it's slow. We have about 24 devices across all three offices. We don't require any kind of staff for deployment and maintenance.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is pretty good.

    How was the initial setup?

    Initial setup was straightforward.

    What about the implementation team?

    We used a third-party for deployment and implementation.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The cost is a one-time fee.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We are currently looking to switch over to a different wireless LAN solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would rate this solution 5 out of 10. My advice is to just make sure it's reliable and offers the security that you need.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    Manager with self employed
    Real User
    Good security, but the price is excessive and the setup complex

    What is most valuable?

    The security is a valuable feature. 

    What needs improvement?

    The setup was complex. The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have used the solution for at least four years.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was complex. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The price of the solution is too high for our country. 

    What other advice do I have?

    The solution is deployed in our organization in a variety of ways.  I rate Mojo Networks as a seven out of ten. 

    What is most valuable?

    The security is a valuable feature. 

    What needs improvement?

    The setup was complex.

    The price should be lowered. It is too high for our country. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have used the solution for at least four years.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was complex. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The price of the solution is too high for our country. 

    What other advice do I have?

    The solution is deployed in our organization in a variety of ways. 

    I rate Mojo Networks as a seven out of ten. 

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate