We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Kaseya VSA OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Kaseya VSA is #3 ranked solution in top Remote Monitoring and Management Software and #7 ranked solution in top Patch Management tools. PeerSpot users give Kaseya VSA an average rating of 8 out of 10. Kaseya VSA is most commonly compared to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager: Kaseya VSA vs Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 27% of all views.
What is Kaseya VSA?

Kaseya is a provider of complete IT management solutions for Managed Service Providers and small to midsized businesses. Kaseya allows organizations to efficiently manage and secure IT in order to drive IT service and business success. Offered as both an industry-leading cloud solution and on-premise software, Kaseya solutions empower businesses to command all of IT centrally, manage remote and distributed environments with ease, and automate across IT management functions. Kaseya solutions currently manage over 10 million endpoints worldwide and are in use by customers in a wide variety of industries, including retail, manufacturing, healthcare, education, government, media, technology, finance, and more. Kaseya, headquartered in Dublin, Ireland is privately held with a presence in over 20 countries.

Kaseya VSA Buyer's Guide

Download the Kaseya VSA Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: January 2022

Kaseya VSA Customers

Sage UK, MSP, CodeBlue Ltd, Connect Work Place Solutions, All Covered, 501cTech, Chairo Christian School, Green Duck

Kaseya VSA Video

Archived Kaseya VSA Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Owner at Mencar Global Consulting SL
Consultant
A solution that offers good remote management with easy scalability and stability
Pros and Cons
  • "The remote management is quite good. Also, the patch management and service desk are great features of the solution."
  • "Some configurations and abilities from the system are not of use. The solution should offer webinars or some sort of training offerings to help users learn what the system can do and how it can be done."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for remote management and remote control.

What is most valuable?

The remote management is quite good. Also, the patch management and service desk are great features of the solution.

What needs improvement?

Although the service desk is good, it's not obvious. It's not easy to know exactly how the system is working and there's the possibility that we are not using some features as we should. 

The management of patches also needs improvement. There are two ways to do that in the solution now, but one, the oldest one, as far as we have found, is working better than the newest one and this has created some problems. You should be able to handle the management of patches not only from Microsoft but also from other vendors. 

Some configurations and abilities from the system are not of use. The solution should offer webinars or some sort of training offerings to help users learn what the system can do and how it can be done.

It would be useful, in the future, if there was a way to maintain another device's firewalls for simple switches.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three to four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In general, the stability has been good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

On the cloud deployment model, scalability is very easy. We currently have four to five techs on our solution.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good. It can always be improved.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex if you use the cloud deployment model. There are some configurations that are not easy to find. You may also not know what the impact on the system will be if you change configurations. In general, the basic items are easy, but if you want anything beyond the standard setup, it's a little bit complex.

The time it takes to deploy the solution depends on the organization. In our case, we did a migration, but if you just start from zero, probably it's easier. For us, with the migration, deployment took about three or four weeks.

You need two people for deployment.

What about the implementation team?

We handled the implementation ourselves.

What other advice do I have?

We used to use the on-premises deployment model, but we have since moved to the cloud.

I would rate the solution eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner at Mencar Global Consulting SL
Consultant
The helpdesk is valuable but needs to be more user-friendly

What is our primary use case?

IT outsourcing.

How has it helped my organization?

IT services for our customers.

What is most valuable?

Administration Maintenance Patching Monitoring Helpdesk.

What needs improvement?

Making the helpdesk more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What is our primary use case?

IT outsourcing.

How has it helped my organization?

IT services for our customers.

What is most valuable?

  • Administration
  • Maintenance
  • Patching
  • Monitoring
  • Helpdesk.

What needs improvement?

Making the helpdesk more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.