We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

What is Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series?

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Blade Servers Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: January 2022

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Customers

Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Video

Archived Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
ITCS user
Director Corporate Systems Division at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We virtualized two sets of 22U racks full of servers at the blade. Complex when you need to add storage functions in the FC.

What is most valuable?

It is a very practical solution because you have all the servers in a minimal space.

How has it helped my organization?

We had two sets of 22U racks full of servers. We virtualized all of them at the blade, thus saving space and money.

What needs improvement?

It is very complex when you need to add storage functions in the FC. It is not only necessary to add the FC switch, you must add the FC Pass Thru 8Gb 18/1, the FC Switch 16Gb Brocade (or other) XX Port. And the FC card to the servers, of course.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution for around one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not encountered any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did experience some scalability issues. After some months, we decided to increase the memory and hard drives. It is “mandatory” to buy the components at the server's manufacturer which can be very expensive. However, if you buy the components at another manufacturer, you lose the guarantee.

How are customer service and technical support?

On a scale from 1-10 (1=worst, 10=best), I would give the technical support a 5.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before this job, I have deployed Intel Servers and have used Intel Blade Servers. At the new enterprise, they had bought the Fujitsu Blade Server before I joined.

How was the initial setup?

The server was bought with all the blades, along with the CPU, RAM and hard drive. I built the RAID volumes and installed the OS myself . It was a very simple process.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is important to evaluate other open-source software in order to save money with the operating systems.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I began to work with the machine because it “came first”. I had not chosen a blade server because all the future hardware updates, must be done with the same manufacturer.

What other advice do I have?

It is much better to use “normal” servers. The initial investment for a blade server is very high and creates dependency.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: The company is distributor of server maker and they got a good price for the blade system.
Product Categories
Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Blade Servers Report and find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, and more!