We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Peplink SpeedFusion vs Steelhead comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Peplink SpeedFusion Logo
3,654 views|2,500 comparisons
Steelhead Logo
2,983 views|1,954 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Peplink SpeedFusion vs. Steelhead and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The SpeedFusion feature is good. It allowed us to move away from IPsec between the sites. It is also a really easy product to deploy.""The SpeedFusion feature is the most valuable.""Our customers find it to be an interesting and tempting solution."

More Peplink SpeedFusion Pros →

"The compression of Riverbed is very powerful. It can also handle large quantities of traffic.""I find the most valuable to be the compression and exchange replication.""It is very easy to install the solution.""TCP optimization... caches a particular TCP connection and the next time a user uses that connection he will reach the destination easily."

More Steelhead Pros →

Cons
"They don't have next generation firewall, UTM, like the other competitors.""Their hardware support isn't the greatest. We've had one unit go down, and it took a while for them to replace it. It was in the Caribbeans, so it might be a location-related issue.""Its pricing is the main issue. The pricing could be improved. I would like to see an outbound policy based on the application. It is a very good feature, and most of the customers are looking for that. They can also include stronger firewall features. This would help the customers in choosing this product as the only device for the SD network."

More Peplink SpeedFusion Cons →

"They should include a network switch in a future release.""Application response time and network performance could be improved.""If we load a primary firewall, the secondary firewall usually handles all the active connections, but in Riverbed, this isn't the case. We lose all the active connections at the moment of failure.""The product should offer more integration capabilities."

More Steelhead Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It has lifetime licensing. Its pricing is high for most of the markets."
  • "Its licensing fee is on a yearly basis. For the price, it is actually pretty good value."
  • "Perpetual licensing, which is good for customers that don't want any annual or subscription based license."
  • More Peplink SpeedFusion Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is expensive and the service contacts are costly too. The cost of the device makes the value proposition borderline acceptable for us. The service contract fees we pay is approximately $30,000 annually."
  • More Steelhead Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Edge solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Our customers find it to be an interesting and tempting solution.
    Top Answer: 
    For the licensing, I think Peplink has mostly perpetual licensing, which is good for customers that don't want an annual or subscription-based license. Any additional license that Peplink offers is… more »
    Top Answer: 
    A disadvantage for Peplink maybe the features are not as strong as those of their competitors. For example, the security itself, still uses very light web filtering and a firewall. They don't have a… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We just did an assessment for our 47 datacenters around North America. The top two enterprise-level network monitoring solutions were ExtraHop first, Riverbed SteelCenter second. Their negotiated cost… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The compression of Riverbed is very powerful. It can also handle large quantities of traffic.
    Top Answer: 
    It's for a very specific use case. It's not for everything. Although the solution is very powerful, it doesn't apply to all enterprises. There is only one feature that needs to be improved. In the… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 26 in WAN Edge
    Views
    3,654
    Comparisons
    2,500
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    578
    Rating
    8.0
    13th
    out of 26 in WAN Edge
    Views
    2,983
    Comparisons
    1,954
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RIverbed Steelhead
    Learn More
    Overview

    Peplink’s patent-pending SpeedFusion technology powers enterprise VPNs that tap into the bandwidth of up to 13 low-cost cable, DSL, 3G/4G/LTE, and other links connected anywhere on your corporate or institutional WAN. Whether you’re transferring a few documents or driving realtime POS data, video feeds, and VoIP conversations, SpeedFusion pumps all your data down a single fat datapipe that’s budget-friendly, ultra-fast, and easily configurable to suit any networking environment.

    Riverbed SteelHead CX is the industry's #1 WAN optimization solution. SteelHead CX is proven to dramatically speed up the performance of applications anywhere in the organization while delivering the best end-user experience even under sub optimal network conditions. Reduce bandwidth utilization by up to 95%, deferring costly network bandwidth upgrades. Increase performance by up to 100x for on-premises applications.

    Offer
    Learn more about Peplink SpeedFusion
    Learn more about Steelhead
    Sample Customers
    MIT Robotics Team, Intel, Apple, Google, Hootsuite, Northrop Gruman, Alcatel-Lucent, Motorola, Avocent, GE, VW, Marriott, Renaissance, WSI, Union /Pacific
    ElAraby, SFK Leblanc, Bobst Group, Northwest Pipe Company, Halkbank, Tradebridge, EFG Hermes
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government6%
    Media Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Government29%
    Energy/Utilities Company21%
    Construction Company7%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider26%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Peplink SpeedFusion vs. Steelhead and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Peplink SpeedFusion is ranked 12th in WAN Edge with 3 reviews while Steelhead is ranked 13th in WAN Edge with 4 reviews. Peplink SpeedFusion is rated 8.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Peplink SpeedFusion writes "Offers bandwidth bundling and perpetual licensing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Scalable Data Referencing provides LAN-like speed over WAN". Peplink SpeedFusion is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cradlepoint NetCloud, Cisco SD-WAN, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Teldat SD-WAN, whereas Steelhead is most compared with WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN, Silver Peak VX, Exinda and Symantec Proxy. See our Peplink SpeedFusion vs. Steelhead report.

    See our list of best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Edge reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.