We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, Microsoft and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: January 2022.
563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Bandwidth optimization and capacity awareness of the bandwidth are valuable features. Its video streaming capabilities are also very useful.""The stability is excellent.""Currently, it's distributing the load perfectly, as per my understanding of our requirements.""There is a lot of documentation available.""NetFlow balancing and traffic balancing are good features.""Its user interface is very easy to use on a day-to-day basis. It is very user-friendly.""The most valuable feature of this solution is IP Intelligence.""The most valuable feature is the proxy."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities.""Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product.""Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pros →

Cons
"The deployment could be simplified.""In terms of what could be improved, I would expect more integration with different platforms and more integration with the backend systems. Additionally, in the next release, I would like a more secure version.""Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future.""The user interface could be improved in F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager.""My only point of contention would be that it is a little pricey.""This is a very expensive solution.""Its scalability and deployment should be better. It should be more scalable, and it should be easier to deploy.""F5 could improve the rule-setting capabilities in the GUI, and they need to simplify web management. For example, the menus in the Citrix GUI are easier to navigate, with a clean structure and layout."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Cons →

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly.""I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.""The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are additional costs depending on what modules or what functionality is required."
  • "F5 pricing is too high, compared to Citrix."
  • "When we purchased additional licenses for our other locations, we received a discount of between 20% and 25%."
  • "F5 BIG-IP can be expensive, although there are trial versions available which are helpful to find out if the solution is right for your company."
  • "The price should be reduced because it is expensive when compared to the competition."
  • "The solution is quite expensive if we compare it with the competition."
  • "It is a bit expensive product. Kemp Loadmaster is much cheaper than F5. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. It can be for one year or three years."
  • "The price of the solution is sometimes expensive."
  • More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
  • More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Its user interface is very easy to use on a day-to-day basis. It is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer: 
    It is a little pricey. I wish the pricing was cheaper, but I wish the pricing was cheaper for everything.
    Top Answer: 
    My only point of contention would be that it is a little pricey.
    Top Answer: 
    Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use.
    Top Answer: 
    It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable SC. A separate license is required for support. I can't be certain, but I believe the fees are determined by the number of IP addresses… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC. Tenable SC's reporting is extremely powerful. The reporting has a very limited customization… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    37,695
    Comparisons
    30,566
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    421
    Rating
    8.2
    20th
    Views
    4,341
    Comparisons
    3,679
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
    Learn More
    Overview

    F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your apps via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on app and server and connection management conditions, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. BIG-IP LTM's architecture includes protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications. BIG-IP LTM tracks the dynamic performance levels of servers and delivers SSL performance and visibility for inbound and outbound traffic, to protect the user experience by encrypting everything from the client to the server.

    BIG-IP LTM provides enterprise-class Application Delivery Controller (ADC). You get granular layer 7 control, SSL offloading and acceleration capabilities, and advanced scaling technologies that deliver performance and reliability on-demand. The highly optimized TCP/IP stack combines TCP/IP techniques and improvements in the latest RFCs with extensions to minimize the effect of congestion and packet loss and recovery. Independent testing tools and customer experiences show LTM's TCP stack delivers up to a 2x performance gain for users and a 4x increase in bandwidth efficiency.

    Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

    Offer
    Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Learn more about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
    Sample Customers
    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    IMDEX
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, Microsoft and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: January 2022.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 35 reviews while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 20th in Application Security with 3 reviews. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Very stable and easy to use with a good GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Good reporting and integration, but it needs a user-friendly dashboard". F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Citrix ADC, NGINX Plus, HAProxy and A10 Networks Thunder ADC, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Acunetix by Invicti, Veracode and Rapid7 AppSpider.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.