"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."
"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."
"The solution is simple to use and has effective automation."
"The product is evolving and the vendor is committed to change."
"The product functionality is fairly high-quality."
"The most valuable feature is the automation, where you press a button and everything fails over seamlessly."
"The stability of SRM has been excellent. It gets a nine-out-of-ten."
"The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing."
"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery testing."
"VMware SRM is very effective between two sites with identical twin storage, you can have synchronization between the two sites."
"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."
"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."
"The interface is not easy to use and can be made more user-friendly."
"I would like to see this solution be more scalable."
"The two vCenters have to be synchronized, which sometimes gives us problems because Keberos does not tolerate more than five minutes in time difference."
"What I think can be improved is the data replication aspect."
"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."
"We've had configuration issues on occasion. We start to fail over, and then we have to call it off because the configuration is not right, or the data stores aren't configured correctly in the secondary data center. Oftentimes, it is just the experience level of the team, and we have to bring in the vendor to help and validate our configuration."
"The solution could improve by removing some of the limitations we have been facing. There could be better integrated."
"We have had an issue when some customers have traditional designs and sites. For example, on one another site, they are using hyper-converged, using VMware, or Nutanix. We have a problem with the synchronization between the storage for site to site. This is the main issue. We are adding some other tools to support the synchronization to allow the movement of the workload from site to site easily."
With CloudEndure Disaster Recovery technology, business continuity and IT resilience are a click away. CloudEndure's one-touch disaster recovery solution utilizes block-level continuous replication, application stack orchestration, and automated machine conversion to ensure near-zero RPO and RTO for all applications, while reducing traditional disaster recovery expenses by over 85%.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is ranked 18th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 2 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 8th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 16 reviews. CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is rated 6.6, while VMware SRM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery writes "Straightforward to set up and is scalable for large nodes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "Enables us to get a lot of server images successfully but it has connectivity issues with auto-recovery". CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, Oracle Data Guard, Zerto, Veeam Backup & Replication and Commvault, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and Commvault. See our CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. VMware SRM report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.