We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cisco Secure Workload vs. Guardicore Centra

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Workload vs. Guardicore Centra and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility.""The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage. The telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent. It's complete. You see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network."

More Cisco Secure Workload Pros »

"This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks.""Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy.""We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming.""The real bonus is the fact that we can secure applications, all the way down to the individual services, on each host. It's actually more granular security than we can get out of a traditional firewall.""The interface and dashboard are amazing.""From day one, you get threat intelligence. It will immediately block active threats, which has been useful.""The most valuable feature is the visibility of processes and connections."

More Guardicore Centra Pros »

Cons
"The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring.""There is some overlap between Cisco Tetration and AppDynamics and I need to have a single pane of glass, rather than have to jump between different tools."

More Cisco Secure Workload Cons »

"Sometimes, the speed needs improvement, especially when it comes to the generation of maps, where it can be a bit slow.""The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy.""The product needs a few features like enhanced user policies and payload-level inspection to improve the offering.""In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session.""Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked.""The maps could go a bit faster. They are useful but slightly slow."

More Guardicore Centra Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

More Cisco Secure Workload Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you.""Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive.""Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."

More Guardicore Centra Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Other then providing micro segmentation capabilities the dashboard provides all required information in single windows for configured workload. With insight feature we even get… more »
Top Answer: Support for all OS as currently they do not support AIX which is normally base OS for any critical Banking Workload  Solution should be able to provide micro Segmentation policy based on process… more »
Top Answer: Micro Segmentation is 1 of the important use case which organization go with Cisco ACI for Agentless  They also got Cisco Tetration for Agent based approach 
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the visibility of processes and connections.
Top Answer: This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you. It provides functionality that is similar in some ways to traditional firewalls and with that… more »
Top Answer: In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session. When we upgrade, I expect that we can exclude user tasks for each session from the terminal.
Ranking
Views
9,145
Comparisons
5,467
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
425
Rating
8.5
Views
8,066
Comparisons
4,638
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,357
Rating
8.9
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Tetration
GuardiCore
Learn More
Overview

Achieve the security required for today's heterogeneous multicloud environment with Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration). Protect workloads across any cloud, application, and workload--anywhere. Automate and implement a secure zero-trust model for micro-segmentation based on application behavior and telemetry. Proactively detect and remediate indicators of compromise to minimize the impact to your business.

Guardicore Centra is a comprehensive data center and cloud security solution that delivers the simplest way to apply micro-segmentation controls to reduce the attack surface and detect and control breaches within east-west traffic. It provides deep visibility into application dependencies and enforces network and process-level policies to protect critical applications.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Workload
Learn more about Guardicore Centra
Sample Customers
ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)
Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider39%
Computer Software Company20%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise83%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise36%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Workload vs. Guardicore Centra and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Secure Workload is ranked 5th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 2 reviews while Guardicore Centra is ranked 4th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 7 reviews. Cisco Secure Workload is rated 8.6, while Guardicore Centra is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Workload writes "Simple to deploy and provides good application visibility along with micro-segmentation feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Guardicore Centra writes "Allowed us to build out a data center topology without worrying about placement of physical or virtual firewalls that can create bottlenecks". Cisco Secure Workload is most compared with VMware NSX, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, vRealize Network Insight and Microsoft Defender for Cloud, whereas Guardicore Centra is most compared with Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, VMware NSX, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Trend Micro Deep Security and Darktrace. See our Cisco Secure Workload vs. Guardicore Centra report.

See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Security vendors, and best Microsegmentation Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.