We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cisco SD-WAN vs. Versa FlexVNF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco SD-WAN Logo
19,449 views|15,772 comparisons
Versa FlexVNF Logo
6,640 views|5,067 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco SD-WAN vs. Versa FlexVNF and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The first part that we like is that we can reuse certain hardware, which is a valuable asset. You can use hardware SKUs that already exist in the network. The second part that we like is the integration with the cloud and the measurement of the cloud's quality. These are the two values that this solution gives as compared to other implementations that we have seen.""The initial setup is quite simple.""Configuration interfaces are quite easy and intuitive. Being a part of the Cisco environment, Cisco SD-WAN is quite straightforward.""We would recommend this solution to customers looking to implement it on a global scale. We recommend the solution, not only because of the functionality or the technical support, but also because of the delivery of the solution, and the docking and upgrading capabilities.""There have been no issues with stability.""The centralized management is the most important feature. We can monitor what is going on at every location in our network with just one center.""It's very easy to manage and monitor the network's health and security using the solution.""It is really easy to deploy and use. It is also easy to use for failovers and designing solutions. The rollout is really quick. It is easy to adjust and roll out."

More Cisco SD-WAN Pros »

"The division of Control Plane and Data Plane is most valuable. It can be deployed anywhere, and you can control it and configure it from anywhere. This is one of the good features of this solution.""There are great security and ops features without the need for having a different box for security.""It is very easy to deploy. The GUI interface is really good, and the security features are also very good. It is also stable and scalable, and their support is also good.""The solution is stable and suitable.""Their dashboard is also a good point for us and the customer. The solution is very clean and easy.""Our organization finds the application routing features extremely useful.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are the next-generation firewall features and geo-blocking capabilities.""Overall, it's nice and very user friendly. That's what makes it so successful. They give you complicated features but with a very simple user interface, and that's been a big success for them."

More Versa FlexVNF Pros »

Cons
"The installation is not easy. If you have experience and it is not your first time doing the installation, it can be easier.""The inexpensive Viptela hardware may be replaced with overpriced Cisco routers. This would be a tragic mistake for Cisco as the lightweight commodity platform built by Viptela is the reason to own this solution.""The licensing model needs to be improved.""The solution could be a bit cheaper.""Technical support could be more helpful and responsive.""Compresson deduplication should be added.""One of the major areas that Cisco can improve on with their SD-WAN offering is their security features. When compared with Fortinet, who have what they call their 'security pillars' (e.g. firewall and security features built-in to their SD-WAN solutions), Cisco generally comes up short. With Cisco, if you need a security component, you have to pay more to get it done. So if they could add more security features that come part and parcel with their existing solutions, then I think Cisco could be very aggressive in the market.""The client portal needs to be improved in order to make the solution much better."

More Cisco SD-WAN Cons »

"Another thing that should be improved in Versa are their firewall features.""Future releases should contain AI for the voice feature.""I heard about them for the first time just before I started working on Versa. They do have blogs for information, but they could publicize more about the documentation and architecture. It doesn't seem to have that much exposure, and they should work on their customer base more.""SASE is the next big thing that is coming up, and it needs to be developed in Versa. This is the only thing that needs to be adapted very quickly by Versa. With the pandemic going on, I would like to see more features for working from home. They have launched Versa Secure Access (VSA), but it is currently immature. They need to tighten it up for work from home and SD-WAN concept.""The security should be improved.""With the pandemic and changing work models, it would be ideal if the product more accessibility options or more diversity within the solution itself.""The support needs to be improved.""The UTM features can be improved. It should offer better functionality."

More Versa FlexVNF Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Cisco's pricing is not entirely satisfactory when you compare the SD-WAN solutions in Asian markets — like the South Asian market in Sri Lanka — because there are several competing brands including Fortinet and Citrix, who provide much the same product for a generally lower price. And when it comes to firewall vendors like Palo Alto and SonicWall, they're also selling here. It's the same with VMware, too; they have much the same features.""The price of the solution is the only negative factor, it is much more expensive compared with the Cisco Meraki SD-WAN solution.""There is no license required for this solution.""Cloud subscription management must be paid for, although this does not incur a perpetual fee.""80 percent reduction in WAN costs. There are no MPLS or P2P circuits left in the organization.""The license model is too complex with too many flavors and options. You might not be able to see it from an end user's point of view, but from a telco point of view, their license model is too complex. They should have a flexible license model. If you want to have good pricing, you need to buy it for a two-year, four-year, or five-year license immediately. Some other vendors have much more flexible license models.""Cisco is more expensive than FortiGate.""The price is high."

More Cisco SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is expensive but it makes sense for the market.""While I cannot provide too much commentary on the price, I feel it to be fair for the moment.""It is not very expensive because of the white box support. Its hardware is much cheaper than other products. With the support for x86 and white box, it is one of the most cost-effective platforms that are currently available.""We provide subscriptions for our customers on a yearly, not monthly, basis."

More Versa FlexVNF Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Load balancing is a feature that allows us to take the best of our links and distribute the load intelligently, always with an eye on the end-customer experience.
Top Answer: It is not the cheapest solution on the market, however, without a doubt, it is one of the options that best handles complex topologies. Therefore there is a need to know more accurately what the… more »
Top Answer: It is transversal to all industries. What is important is to work on the costs of the solution. On the technical side, manufacturer-independent solutions should be able to handle different topologies… more »
Top Answer: The flexibility is a great feature.
Top Answer: While I cannot provide too much commentary on the price, I feel it to be fair for the moment. I should note that Citrix or Cisco Meraki are coming out with more competitive prices. The comparative… more »
Top Answer: I don't have issues with the hardware, as the requisite capacity is visible in the data sheets. All the details in the data sheets are accounted for. But, I find myself confused when it comes to… more »
Ranking
Views
19,449
Comparisons
15,772
Reviews
37
Average Words per Review
612
Rating
7.9
Views
6,640
Comparisons
5,067
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
763
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Viptela, Cisco vEdge Cloud Router
FlexVNF
Learn More
Versa Networks
Video Not Available
Overview

Deploy software-defined WAN without compromising the application experience.

Versa FlexVNF is a multi-service, multi-tenant software platform built from ground up on cloud principles to deliver scale, segmentation, programmability and automation. It provides both networking and security functions in a single software along with service chaining capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco SD-WAN
Learn more about Versa FlexVNF
Sample Customers
Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
CenturyLink, RCN Business, Colt Technology Services
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider50%
Transportation Company10%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
Computer Software Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider39%
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company4%
Government4%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider89%
Engineering Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company22%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise37%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise59%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise40%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco SD-WAN vs. Versa FlexVNF and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 41 reviews while Versa FlexVNF is ranked 3rd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 10 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Versa FlexVNF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "Stable, cutting-edge, and robust". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Versa FlexVNF writes "Excellent integration capabilities, good UI and offers great security features". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Meraki SD-WAN, Citrix SD-WAN and Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect, whereas Versa FlexVNF is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Zscaler SASE and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Cisco SD-WAN vs. Versa FlexVNF report.

See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.