We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Cisco SD-WAN vs Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco SD-WAN vs. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The deployment is quite simple and straightforward.""It's a complete solution with many security features.""The product's brand recognition is one of the most valuable aspects of the solution.""If I have to give a neutral view of all the SD-WAN platforms that I have known so far, Cisco is good in routing.""The regular net routing is a good feature.""You can easily scale the product.""The solution is great at aggregating the traffic and then sending it in one direction.""SD-WAN is very stable - once it's deployed, you can just forget about it, it runs by itself."

More Cisco SD-WAN Pros →

"Forcepoint is a complete package because it has network and systems applications. Other firewalls are only for the network.""When comparing this solution to others this one has better reporting, user management, and is easy to use.""It is a stable solution, and there are no issues so far.""Forcepoint's stability is satisfactory, for the most part.""I like the Firewall and the IPS.""The most valuable feature is the console management.""The blocking, based on the signal provided, is the solution's most valuable aspect.""It is a scalable product. I know a customer who has deployed more than 4,000 firewalls in a single deployment."

More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Pros →

Cons
"Cisco's router and voice gateway has not been available since the launch of SD-WAN.""Better pricing and greater security would be nice to see.""The installation is not easy. If you have experience and it is not your first time doing the installation, it can be easier.""It should also be much more affordable for a larger number of customers.""The solution needs to be more flexible around legacy devices.""I would like to see a better, web-based interface to make changes to the configuration or to view statistics.""The solution could be more secure. Security is always a priority for us.""Cisco could do more to offer bundling of the SD-WAN and other solutions."

More Cisco SD-WAN Cons →

"The security features need to be improved.""They need to work on stability, it has not been the best in our experience.""The company should update the URL filtering database. They need to enhance the URL filtering and make it easier to customize.""The solution needs to build upon its network functionality. It needs to be a bit smarter.""Making this solution easier to use would be an improvement.""Its interface is complex when compared with a firewall like FortiGate. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall needs a management console, whereas FortiGate doesn't need any console. When you have a few devices, a console is not really necessary. It's good to have a private console only when you have a lot of devices.""The ability to dynamically change policies could be improved.""Something that I've noticed that Forcepoint lacks, is the training that they offer to their end-customers"

More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for the Cisco Customer Care support, which is a couple of hundred dollars."
  • "80 percent reduction in WAN costs. There are no MPLS or P2P circuits left in the organization."
  • "Cisco is more expensive than some competing products."
  • "SD-WAN as a service is probably something in the neighborhood of $100 to $200 a month per location."
  • "The costs are a bit on the high side."
  • "It is much cheaper than other solutions. Most of our clients are the top 500 companies, and they all have a corporate contract."
  • "The license model is too complex with too many flavors and options. You might not be able to see it from an end user's point of view, but from a telco point of view, their license model is too complex. They should have a flexible license model. If you want to have good pricing, you need to buy it for a two-year, four-year, or five-year license immediately. Some other vendors have much more flexible license models."
  • "It is going to be on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."
  • More Cisco SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Forcepoint is very expensive but it's really secure."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The training that they offer to their end-customers. It's quite expensive, I believe it costs roughly $11,000"
  • "Everything in Forcepoint comes with an individual license, which is kind of a problem. In our last meeting, they said that it may change at the beginning of 2021, and they will try to merge some licenses together. Customers will get more features than what they got previously. We will wait and see."
  • "We have found the price could be reduced. It is a little expensive."
  • "The pricing of the solution is normally competitive with other products."
  • "The pricing should be more competitive against other vendors in the market."
  • "The cost is fair, but it could be improved."
  • More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    One of the most valuable features is that they have multiple SD-WAN options: you have Meraki for simple management solutions, you have Viptela, and you have the option of having any type of WAN… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The pricing is fair, and it's on par with the market vendors. But based on the competition, Cisco could work on the pricing, go deep on discounts and provide more commercially viable solutions to… more »
    Top Answer: 
    This solution could be improved with a simpler implementation process and licensing model. As for additional features, maybe from a security perspective, it could have more features built into the… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I like the IPS. IPS is the master feature. I depend on the firewall and sandbox.
    Top Answer: 
    We have just a subscription for the cloud, and this license is great. The license is so good.
    Top Answer: 
    Management could be better. They can improve the management. I think all our customers can't accept firewalls that have standalone management. So, they prefer Fortinet or Palo Alto. But overall… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    19,600
    Comparisons
    15,727
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    612
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    5,863
    Comparisons
    4,632
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Viptela, Cisco vEdge Cloud Router
    Forcepoint NGFW, Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall, McAfee Network Security Platform, Intel Security Network Security Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco SD-WAN is a software-defined WAN (wide area network) solution that provides for secure stable connections to applications for enterprises and organizations. Cisco SD-WAN works to speed up the seamless movement to the cloud. A very robust and reliable solution, Cisco SD-WAN is cutting-edge in threat security and stability of the complete network and has very low latency. Cisco SD-WAN uses Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS), data centers, and even the internet to smoothly advance the move to a SASE (Service Access Service Edge)-based architecture. The Cisco SD-WAN dashboard gives you a complete visual of your entire infrastructure; you can see everything in real time. You will also have simplified IT operations and gain advanced network capabilities, dependability, and security. One valued feature is the overlay management protocol (OMP), which applies to your entire network to speedily connect all your company data centers. Cisco SD-WAN has a very flexible architecture and can be deployed on premises, in the cloud, hybrid, and even has multi-cloud options. Cisco SD-WAN instantly discovers, authenticates, and provisions all devices, both existing and new.

    Cisco SD-WAN simplifies the management of multiple connections across the WAN, improves the end-user experience, improves overall application functionality and performance, and is a very cost-effective solution. Cisco SD-WAN integrates well with Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and many other cloud-based business solutions. Additionally, Cisco SD-WAN optimizes connectivity and streamlines workflows for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Azure.

    Benefits of Cisco SD-WAN

    • Increased profitability - Cisco SD-WAN will improve performance and decrease overall connectivity costs.
    • Improved productivity - Cisco SD-WAN requires less staff to manage and secure the WANs so valuable resources can be allocated elsewhere in your organization, increasing total productivity.
    • Flexible scalability- Cisco SD-WAN’s flexible and easily scalable architecture will allow your organization to address significantly greater business opportunities, helping to consistently increase revenue.
    • Enhanced security - Cisco SD-WAN offers real-time policy enforcement, ensuring that downtime and unplanned outages are kept to a minimum.

    What real users have to say:

    Cisco SD-WAN is fast with lower costs: “Using SD-WAN to combine services can result in better up time, higher speeds, and much lower costs.”

    Cisco is a brand you can trust: “Cisco is an industry leader, so customers have a high level of trust with the brand - more so than with some newcomers that might have some more revolutionary solutions, but no name recognition.”

    Cisco SD-WAN offers load-balancing and real-time traffic monitoring: “Load balancing is a feature that allows us to take the best of our links and distribute the load intelligently, always with an eye on the end-customer experience.”

    Forcepoint Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall protects enterprise networks with high-performance "intelligence aware" security supported by real-time updates. This enables Stonesoft to deliver the industry's best defense against advanced evasions, alone with complete next-generation firewall protection when and where you need it - at remote sites, branch offices, data centers, and the network edge.
    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco SD-WAN
    Learn more about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
    Sample Customers
    Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider48%
    Transportation Company9%
    Construction Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Government7%
    Energy/Utilities Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise22%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco SD-WAN vs. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 42 reviews while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is ranked 5th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 19 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 7.8, while Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "Stable, cutting-edge, and robust". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall writes "Good console management, but the interface is not user-friendly and application filtering needs finer granularity". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF, Meraki SD-WAN and Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect, whereas Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention, Darktrace, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall and Cisco ASA Firewall. See our Cisco SD-WAN vs. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall report.

    See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.