"The reusability of the solution is excellent. It's a superior feature - far superior to any other tool on the market."
"Blue Prism is able to scale up at an enterprise-level. It's what I used when I was working for a big bank in Belgium."
"The most valuable feature is the customizability."
"I would say that the stability of Blue Prism is superior to any of the competing products because of the maintainability of the features and the openness of the tool."
"The solution is very complete. It's a good solution, for the kind of features that they offer."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"Once it does the monitor, it collects the respective data and creates an output that is required for reconfiguration."
"Ability to see the blueprint of the design executed alongside the actual process."
"I like that compared to other tools, HyperScience works best with handwritten documents."
"There's a need to deal with unstructured input with RPA."
"I wouldn't call Blue Prism user-friendly. It's one of its downfalls. They would benefit from having drag and drop functionality, for example. It would make them a strong competitor in the space. There needs to be less reliance on coding for customization, similar to Microsoft's Power Automate."
"It takes a while to get up and running."
"Lacking advance features like CIO and optical character recognition"
"The cost is a bit high. Other tools are much cheaper."
"Blue Prism might consider adding package options to allow users to come onboard in different ways that meet their needs rather than buying in to the whole package."
"The pricing was a bit high, from what I understand. That might have played a role in the decision to migrate to another solution."
"Selecting the right business processes that are stable enough to automate can be challenging."
"The product's usability could be better. The first pain point is that we're getting the output in a different format, and we were expecting a different timetable. The second point is that if you want better results, HyperScience says you have to configure a minimal PDF or a maximum of 400 PDFs. If you want results with 400 PDFs for what's written by these doctors, then you also configure the maximum of 400 templates for that. So, it's essentially a lack of support from HyperScience. In the next release, it would be better if failure scenarios were reduced. It would also help if they offered different formats, inputs or injections, and added different scenarios."
Earn 20 points
The Thoughtonomy Virtual Workforce is a highly flexible intelligent automation platform. It uses software to replicate the way people work in existing applications and systems, the processes they follow, and the decisions they make, to deliver automation without disruption.
HyperScience's proprietary machine learning solution extracts and transcribes handwritten, cursive script, and machine printed text with up to 95% automation and over 99.5% accuracy, helping enterprises reduce costs, streamline operations, and drive new business and revenue opportunities.
Blue Prism Cloud is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 15 reviews while HyperScience is ranked 5th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 1 review. Blue Prism Cloud is rated 7.8, while HyperScience is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Blue Prism Cloud writes "Additional functionality over the Enterprise version make good over the difficulty of installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HyperScience writes "An intelligent document processing and automation solution that works well with hand written documents, but it would be better if it supported more formats". Blue Prism Cloud is most compared with Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, ABBYY FlexiCapture and BotFarm, whereas HyperScience is most compared with ABBYY FlexiCapture, UiPath, Infrrd OCR, Kofax RPA and ANTstein.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.