We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Azure Monitor vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.""Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It is fairly good at that.""Azure Monitor is very stable.""The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.""The solution is quite stable.""Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis.""Provides an overview and high-level information.""The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"Its price and the flexibility to deploy are the most valuable. Flexibility is very important, and you can scale from very basic to more complex. This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature. We have a very good and long relationship with ManageEngine support guys. They provide very good support for us.""ManageEngine Applications Manager maintains the historical data and it's easy for us to analyze the trends and patterns and fix them accordingly.""The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Pros →

Cons
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs.""The price could be lower but it is not a must.""The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.""The process of implementation needs to be easier.""I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now.""When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.""Lacks information including details related to where problems lie.""Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"They could probably rearrange the UI so that it would be easy for people who are new to the Application Manager to configure things.""They can improve the post-processing of the data. AppDynamics has more powerful tools for post-processing or analytics. It has some limitations in more complex environments, but because we are free to use different solutions, we try to find what is best for the customers or the problem we are trying to solve.""The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."
  • "Its price is good."
  • More ManageEngine Applications Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Provides an overview and high-level information.
    Top Answer: 
    If Azure Monitor wants to compete with other APM products in the industry, it has to stitch together the information and user flow. It also needs to provide all the information, as you get with Stock… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    12,484
    Comparisons
    10,562
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    462
    Rating
    7.3
    Views
    1,340
    Comparisons
    1,045
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Applications Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

    ManageEngine Applications Manager is an enterprise-ready, easy-to-use, affordable application management solution that helps enterprises monitor their mission-critical applications and data centers effectively. It enables you to monitor web applications, web servers, application servers, databases, and systems which are the lifeline of businesses. Its heterogeneous monitoring capability and business centric view helps the IT Team to troubleshoot application performance issues quickly.

    Offer
    Learn more about Azure Monitor
    Learn more about ManageEngine Applications Manager
    Sample Customers
    Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
    Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Government8%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise33%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Monitor is ranked 8th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 9 reviews while ManageEngine Applications Manager is ranked 20th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.2, while ManageEngine Applications Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Requires out of the box monitoring, real-time monitoring, and better network mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Applications Manager writes "Offers a service to monitor each and every specific feature in a server". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk, Dynatrace, New Relic APM and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas ManageEngine Applications Manager is most compared with AppDynamics, Dynatrace, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, New Relic APM and SCOM. See our Azure Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.